Are Seconal And Nembutal Part Of Opiates

Fatima and pedophilia

Fatima is the most colossal lie in history.

Vojtyla first is self-referenced saying that the third secret was about his person.
The message said that a bishop dressed in white would be killed with arrows. Vojtyla told the world that that bishop had him and that he was killed with arrows was referring to the attack suffered in 1981. So, here or have the wrong lady to say he would be killed or he was wrong to see the message addressed to him. And people? All took the bait like idiots and the faithful took the bait (here with malice) even Catholic theologians servants of the owner, who wrote kilometers of pages to convince Catholics that the pope shit those were true. As pope Vojtila, a lover of the narcissistic personality to the climax I always expected this and more, as indeed has been in 25 years of his papacy, based only on rallies and sull'appariscenza ocean where he appeared as the media star who tried constantly the camera to be seen in an attitude of prayer.

These days it is feared the possibility that the clerical pedophilia is also part of the third secret of Fatima. In short, every pope that if something comes attaches to the third secret, Vojtyla to satisfy his desire to appear, Ratzinger to get rid of the shame of the abettor e mentitore occulto. Non mi stupisce dunque quest'altra cattiveria: Quella di togliersi di dosso le responsabilità di tali crimini affermando che, siccome la madonna l'aveva previsto, era necessario che accadesse.

Siccome l'indottrinamento cattolico è fondato sul convincimento che tutto ciò che accade è voluto da Dio, che muove i fili della storia, non è difficile convincere i credenti cattolici che anche la pedofilia rientri nel misterioso disegno di Dio di salvezza dell'umanità attraverso il sacrificio di bambini innocenti, così come la redenzione dell'umanità peccatrice sarebbe avvenuta attraverso il sacrificio voluto da Dio per su Figlio innocente, sulla croce. In pratica il prete sacrificing an innocent child, according to the church, is nothing but the repeater of the sacrifice of innocent Christ on the cross.

Pope in the end it always comes out unscathed in the eyes of gullible Catholics, who have been indoctrinated to perfection the redemptive sacrifice of Christ, so that we Catholics themselves are prepared to see, in all forms of violence suffered by innocent people, the repetition of the sacrifice of Christ on the cross so the priest ordained by God to point at savior of humanity passes by sacrificing children.

crriminale But there is nothing more of it in this world?

and simple then attribute to God for the Pope also colpe della pedofilia. Come dire: Dio ha voluto che accadesse, la madonna l'ha rivelata come segreto ai tre pastorelli, dunque la cosa doveva accadere ed io non c'entro nulla. Daltronde non mi meraviglia questa rivelazione se penso a cosa ha detto padre Livio di radio Maria riguardo al terremoto de L'Aquila. Tutto questo va a braccetto con la teologia della redenzione inventata dalla chiesa per non essere mai accusata di perversione e violenza , perché ogni cosa che accade è voluta da Dio.

Qualcuno dirà: Ma allora perché adesso il papa sta facendo vedere che è disposto a denunciare tutti i preti pedofili? Farsa, solo farsa. Con questa promessa che riguarda il futuro intanto si para il culo e riacquista credibility for past wrongs. Then we'll see if the priests stop raping children. Will never stop because it is inherent in the priestly state violence against the innocent, is a necessity required by the theology of redemption. The violent pedophile priest while a child celebrates a liturgical rite.

I do not know what strategy will put in place to cover new pedophilia, but I do not think those are Denice priests to civil authorities. If anything, they denounce a hundred or so everyone will be satisfied as crime will continue. Here too the rule, sacrifice some to save many.

There is only one way to ensure that all queste cose siano un lontano penoso ricordo: Che la chiesa sparisca dalla faccia della terra: E' possibile? E possibile solo ad una condizione: E qui punrtroppo la soluzione è legata al denaro. Non foraggiate più la chiesa, nessuno deve più farlo. ma per fare questo bisogjna cominciare a denunciare pubblicamente nelle piazze e in tutti i luoghi gli inganni della chiesa da duemila anni.

Per quanto mi riguarda lo sto facendo da anni ma sono solo, almeno nella mia zona. Non basta.

Bisogna creare delle associazioni o rtinforzare quelle già esistenti. Ne cito una per tutte, L'UAAR.

L'importante è uscire allo scoperto senza afraid to predict the reputation and hence the appeal is urgent because the believers begin to think with your brain and do not delegate their consciousness of any priest or bishop.

're all jackals, with all due respect for these animals.

Figliodeltuono

How Long Does It Take Erythromycin To Work?

The symbol of the cross

No imposed on the crucifix ... but the cross is a different reality ...

Beyond all the rants that are made these days about the symbol of the cross, rants that inevitably arise as a result of misuse of this symbol that has been done historically and, even more, beyond the reasons puerile that the church gives this symbol and that it even makes us see how, even though it has this symbol, in fact none has ever grasped the meaning than to flaunt as a symbol of redemption that brings up the crucifix as the one who with his sacrifice has freed the world from the evil (yes, the great theological flaw that generates obsessional neurosis), well beyond all these considerations, in my view insufficient to demolish this symbol, I would try to give a meaning of this sign which is the result of what the cross really is.


Meanwhile this is the oldest symbol of the crucifix itself, and of Christianity itself. And 'the symbol of the three dimensions of infinite space, if prolonged, in fact, the two lines cross, they have no end.

But the most important thing is that the cross is geometrically the intersection of two diameters of a sphere, in this case appropriately chosen to create a perfect perpendicularity. We take as a reference but in fact only two in the same sphere diameters are endless. Two signify, as already mentioned, the perfect perpendicularity that within an infinite sphere, cosmic symbolism, the endless lines may be present in it.

Ultimately if we think of the cross as the set of infinitives energy ties between the two cross into the cosmic sphere, which hold together the Cosmo stesso, allora il tutto assume un significato di Unità.

Immaginiamo una Sfera e al suo interno gli infiniti diametri esistenti.

Ebbene questi infiniti diametri presenti nella Sfera cosmica avranno tutti i propri corrispettivi che si incroceranno in modo perpendicolare, formando così una perfetta rete energetica che tiene unito il Cosmo in modo tale da farlo risultare perfettamente sferico.

E' dunque inutile denigrare la croce facendogli assumere ad esempio la forma di una svastica: In questo caso è l'uomo che ha aggiunto ad ogni estremo della croce, dei piccoli segmenti che ne snaturano la forma naturale.

Voglio solo affermare che se spiegassimo ad ogni uomo-donna, credente o meno, che the cross is what I just said, no one would dare call into question the validity of the cosmos. A Muslim because he hates the cross? Simple: because the cross was the symbol of those who were killed. The atheist because he hates the cross? Why not accept the right meant that the church gave her hanging a man who has come through the cross to redeem us (sign macabre).

The cross, therefore, WITHOUT THE CROSS, is in itself a sign of unity of the cosmos, the same way, should symbolize the unity of humankind, as many small Cosmi us all.

This meaning of the cross makes it no more a sign or a sign of moral injustice, although that would already be commendable.

The Cross is, in short, the distinctive symbol of the cosmic forces that drive evolution in the Universe. E ', therefore, a secular symbol for excellence and has nothing to do with religion. The church has made it a sign of exploitation, but not for this division must be a cosmic symbol of hate just because it has been used to kill. And 'as if I hated all the trees of the earth because somebody uses the branches of trees to beat people.

If so I have no trouble keeping this symbol in my house. Indeed the cross gaurdando I remember that I'm evolving with the universe. But if we all understood keep it outside the home, in all spheres of civil life, where she reminds the viewer that we are all evolving, so to speak, and then, crossing the each other. What better symbol to describe the mutual love?

Figliodeltuono

Signs Of Infection In A Burn

The Immaculate Conception: the Feast of clerical sexual phobia

a mother there is only one ...

The church throughout history has raised much the figure of Mary to diminish the woman's real and the idealized to the point that Mary became the projection of the inner need that any man of maternal, so Maria replaces the true carnal mother to whom they should instead go all the attention possible. Almost all priests, exalts the figure of Mary because it replaces the role of the natural mother, having been torn, the priests themselves, with the family to let them enter the seminary at 13-14 years, their critical age when the boy needs mother. Now it happens that the priest often diverted experience also affects those who may have had a steady growth in the family. This projection reaches the climax because Mary became the "place" where are all of the emotional demands not really matured. The critical point is that, while the natural mother has a normal mother-son relationship, with Maria idealized and elevated to divine status by the church (who happens to be made up of priests and bishops who you bring into this lack maternal affection-natural) are replaced by the guilt if one does some Sgarro from both sexually, because it is as if he had a super-mother, who sees everything, even the most hidden, and for other aspects of life, which is why Mary was immaculate declared, because he has to call the faithful to be blameless and just about the sexual sphere. But life, nature does not ask anyone to make sacrifices, penance, and the like. The thing is much deeper as it really is. We must be very careful, then, because at this point already joined the deviant sexual phobia old church for the minutiae. In this case the lady becomes the one who controls us, other than the natural mother, tender, who understands the son and teaches him according to nature, while the immaculate, right to his property as a woman without sin, stands in the human gesture controller for calling for fasting sinners, not to end prayers, penance (see Fatima where the Virgin Mary asked the three children to do penance). This is inhumane. So attention to what the priests teach when it comes to the Immaculate Conception which is bullshit, for another dangerous, the greater that Christianity was never able to give birth. These priests are those who lack the affection of her mother and many of them later became bishops, and certainly not removed off this complex, in fact much worse. I think that is enough for a normal person and remains the natural mother. This is my thinking but also the reality of a psychoanalytic clergy lack of the female figure. Then when you have to do with bishops who had clearly demonstrate these shortcomings to be blocked at the narcissistic stage of development pscichico which, coincidentally, it was just at the age of 13-14 years, then of course everything else .... that the Immaculate Conception. But as immaculate. On the one hand you laugh at the chickens, on the other are dangerous to the distortion of sexuality created in the boys in the middle of psychic development.

Figliodeltuono

What Can U Do To Help A Newborn With Phlegm

thirst for supremacy

John Paul II school ...

You may have noticed the tactics of this pope, which is aligned in a clear manner in the footsteps of John Paul II, as all the popes in history, with very few exceptions. A devious tactics cloaked by false and hypocritical gooders. After his election, Ratzinger goes in Regensburg, Germany and delivers a poisonous trial of Muhammad, even though we know that Muslims, when you question their prophet, rage to such an extent as to create concern. What does as a second step? The visit to the Muslims, which causes discontent and dissent in Islam itself.


Lately Ratz announces intention to canonize Pius XII, creating scomnpiglio and divisions not only in the Jewish world but also among Catholics. Even here, what is the second step? The visit to the synagogue in Rome and again, inevitably, arise in the same divisions Jewish world.

These two acts of defiance to two religious worlds such as Islam and Judaism are the tip of the iceberg of a situation of real hatred towards other religions, already expressed in the days when the Ratz was prefect of the Holy office. I remember that the then Cardinal Ratzinger clearly expressed his dislike of other religions several times through written categorical imperative and the inferiority of other faiths, even those closest to the church as the Waldensians and other Protestant denominations. I remember the document "Dominus Jesus" is said to have been written by John Paul II, who signed it anyway and so in co-responsible, but in fact the author was there and he is clearly said that there is no salvation outside the church, the old Tridentine dogma that had been canceled by the Council Vatican II and that this pope has taken over and made the basis of its medieval theology. Long ago, the pope already said that the Protestant churches could not be called sister churches because they did not exist in the apostolic succession. I would remind the dear Ratz (?!?) that if you support the apostolic succession in order to assert his claim to superiority over the world, it seems inevitable as his church is based on an inhumanity unparalleled who shed rivers of innocent blood. I do not understand how they did the popes to establish their authority on a subject such as apostolic succession. If we look at who these apoostoli throughout history there is to shudder. Hitler and Stalin in the face of so much inhumanity on the part of the Catholic Church are PIVELLINA.

The leopard can not change its spots. The Catholic church was rebuilt the trick but his hypocrisy is manifested by these inhuman acts of alleged superiority towards other religions. And the pope has achieved its purpose, to be invited first by Muslims and Jews today. And so it will be beatified Pius XII and the Jewish community mocked. This pope does not seek dialogue but the overpowering, sweet, subtle, painless and invisible. They had understood the teachers and students of Wisdom. And it's always like this, where there is human wisdom has no place for religion

Figliodeltuono