Ticklish Female Celebrty

How do you ruin a cult

breathtaking curves, magnetic eyes and a thrilling life. It is they, the kids of Beverly Hills. Those sixteen are already behind the wheel of a sparkling Cabriolet, spending the evenings in the local the most exclusive, they can afford to satisfy every whim. And that, incidentally, are the heart of one of the most revolutionary products tv.

was in 1990 when Aaron Spelling, producer of Love Boat , Charlie's Angels and Fantasy , had suggested that the foremen FOX Beverly Hills, 90210 , ambitious project focusing on the fast life (but not too much) of a handful of students. The series had initiated the transfer from Minnesota for Walsh, Mulino Bianco family values \u200b\u200band all golden heart. Jim, Cindy, Brenda and Brandon had gathered to address the problems of a new life, thousands of miles away from hometown. And start all over again, especially in a city where luxury and corruption reign supreme, had proved more difficult than expected.

Of course, if he continued to focus on the difficulties of adaptation, the plot would have been dull and unoriginal. And with the yawning effect guaranteed the show would not have pulled ahead for ten seasons.

What has enabled BH to rise all'olim some of the great serial is the original point of view with which events are narrated. No more police officers struggling with crime, the devil's ultraquarantenni suffering from heart problems for the first time are teenagers on the television to dominate. Because they - and it took for capacitation Spelling - have a love life worthy of the most intricate soap. And, guess', face difficult situations in which even an adult can recognize.

When the curtain fell on the serial, the winning formula could not end up relegated to oblivion. Absolutely not. And twenty years later we thought that astute Rob Thomas (Veronica Mars ) to brush up. Believing (naively) that a little politically incorrect enough to revive the teen genre. A genre that - the recent "Pretty Little Liars" and "The Vampire Diaries" docent - today has a life only when mixed with dark shades of mystery: the simple teendrama, stripped of any mystery subplot, it flourishes more on the public.

why the spin-off 90210 turns out to be an ordinary review of issues already detailed by the various "Dawson's Creek," "The OC," "One Tree Hill." And without anything appetizing. Even the story sounds repetitive departure: this time the brothers are Annie and Dixon, by some knowledge (Navid and Silver) are respectively introduced into the glossy world without rules and that is the background of serial. From here on is all a coupling between the various characters, without the emergence of "soul mates" for those couples to remain so until the end. Sensitive issues such as addiction or criminality among young people are not even treated with due respect, like their predecessors. All is resolved with a laugh and a pat on the shoulder. Manco was an Italian fiction.

The fault is not attributable only to Thomas, who, for heaven's sake, he had good intentions. And plus the pilot has its appeal. Have led to the decline in the ridiculous helped Gabe Sachs and Jeff Judah, two in their careers that have collected more flops than successes. A name all about? Life As We Know It , the story of a group of high school, which only goes between school and social life in an attempt to realize their dreams. There were already napping, eh? Yet the Americans, given the cancellation after only 13 episodes by ABC.

If 90210 trudging from point to point with audience less than 2 million spectators, is the merit of the sporadic appearance of the original cast members. Time and will air a season of cancellation. Want to bet?

Shark Birthday Invitation

SQUARE CONSTRUCTION OF COOK AND ROUTE VESCOVADO

Electric Box For Iphone Level 41

LA NOSTRA ASSOCIAZIONE HA VINTO IL BANDO INDETTO DALLA II CIRCOSCRIZIONE NORD DEL COMUNE DI TERNI PER LA REALIZZAZIONE DI ADDOBBI ECOSOSTENIBILI PER VIA DEL VESCOVADO E PIAZZA V.CUOCO

ECCO LE FOTO DELLA LAVORAZIONE E DELL'ALLESTIMENTO DA OGGI VISIBILE

Acronis True Image Wd Installation Interrupted

reflect on the contradictions of the God of the Bible

logical analysis

A reasonable person, reflecting on God, can not help but notice all the amazing contradictions. They are anywhere you look.
This is a very simple example. On the day that Moses came down from Mount Sinai with the stone tablets containing the Ten Commandments, he discovered that the Israelites had built a golden lamb. To punish his people, Moses gathered a group of men and acted as written in the book of Exodus, chapter 32:

shouted to them: Thus saith the Lord, the God of Israel: Ciascuno di voi tenga la spada al fianco. Passate e ripassate nell'accampamento da una porta all'altra: uccida ognuno il proprio fratello, ognuno il proprio amico, ognuno il proprio parente". I figli di Levi agirono secondo il comando di Mosè e in quel giorno perirono circa tremila uomini del popolo.

Quindi... un minuto prima abbiamo Dio che incide nella pietra "Non uccidere". Poi il minuto successivo abbiamo Dio che dice ad ogni uomo di tenere una spada al fianco e di uccidere migliaia di persone. Non vi aspettereste che l'onnipotente sovrano dell'universo sia un po' più coerente? 3000 persone morte sono una bella disobbedienza a quel comandamento. Ovviamente questa è una assoluta contraddizione. La ragione per cui trovate how these contradictions in the Bible is because God is imaginary.
When you look at slavery, we have the same feeling of total contradiction. It is obvious that modern humans for slavery is an abomination. The fact that God is for slavery in the Bible shows us that God is imaginary.

The Italian religious press seems to be against torture. See for example this article, which reports the following:

And if man, in his blindness, profane and degrades the body and claims the right to torture and the death penalty, God, in his bright love, proclaims that he is the source of life and His Son Jesus is "the resurrection and the life" (Jn 11:25).

If you think for a moment, vedrede that here too there is a contradiction. What God has planned for people who do not accept Jesus Christ as their savior? According to Christian belief, plans to torture them for eternity in hellfire. As we all know that torture is always wrong, we have a contradiction.
According to Genesis, God also decided to torture women for all eternity with a painful birth. Because of transgression for having eaten the fruit, God said to Eve:

greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception, in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children.

This is obviously torture. Inflict excruciating pain on someone as punishment is just a dictionary definition for torture.
Thus, in the Bible, God Almighty is the torturer of the universe. Unfortunately, according to what he writes religious literature today, torture is always wrong. The fact that a perfect God is doing something that is always wrong, it shows the contradiction.
If you saw these contradictions and accepted it as obvious, you get to the truth: God is imaginary. The evidence is all around you.

Understanding rationalizations
there any Christian who says that Hell does not involve torture. "Hell is just separation from God, not a fiery place of torture." Therefore, in his mind, is able to rationalize how God does not torture.
To believe this rationalization, we shall ignore the Gospel. If you read the Bible, you can not escape the fact that Hell is a place of torture. There are several verses that describe the Inferno:

• He has a winnowing fan, will clear his threshing floor and gather his wheat into the barn, but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire. (Matthew 3:12)
• The Son of Man will send his angels and they will gather out of his kingdom all causes and all the workers of iniquity e li getteranno nella fornace ardente dove sarà pianto e stridore di denti. (Matteo 13:41-42)
• Così sarà alla fine del mondo. Verranno gli angeli e separeranno i cattivi dai buoni e li getteranno nella fornace ardente, dove sarà pianto e stridore di denti. (Matteo 13:49-50)

Una "fornace ardente" è ovviamente un luogo di tortura.

Quello che dovete fare è smettere di razionalizzare e accettare le prove che vedete dappertutto. Dio è immaginario. Tutte le contraddizioni della vostra religione lo provano.

Mattia Fabbri Filosofo     da http://www.godisimaginary.com/

Maxine Jokes On Healthcare Plan

The God of the Bible endorses slavery

Ecco dieci passaggi della Bibbia che mostrano chiaramente la posizione di Dio riguardo alla schiavitù:

Genesi capitolo 17, verso 12:

Quando avrà otto giorni, sarà circonciso tra di voi ogni maschio di generazione in generazione, tanto quello nato in casa come quello comperato con denaro da qualunque straniero che non sia della tua stirpe.

In questo passaggio Dio sa che delle persone comprano altre persone e, abbastanza ovviamente, non ha problemi con questo. Dio vuole che gli schiavi siano circoncisi proprio come i non schiavi.

Esodo Capitolo 12, verso 43:

The Lord said to Moses and Aaron, "This is the ritual of the Passover: no foreigner shall eat. As each slave bought with money, then circumcised may eat it. The casual and the hired servant shall not eat .

Again God shows that he is completely comfortable with the concept of slavery and gives special treatment to the slaves.

Exodus Chapter 21, verse 1:

These are you set before them. When you buy a slave jew, he shall serve six years and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing. If he comes alone, just come out, if he were married, his wife shall go out with him. If his master gives him a wife and she bears him sons or daughters, the woman and her children shall be her master and he shall go out alone. But if the servant says: I love my master, my wife, my children, do not go out free, then its owner will take him before God, he will pull over to the door or the doorpost and pierce ear with an awl, he shall serve him forever.

Here God describes how to become a slave to life and shows that it is indeed acceptable to separate the slaves from their families. God also shows to approve the marking of slaves through mutilation.

Exodus Chapter 21, verse 20:

When a man strikes his slave with a rod, or his maidservant, and he die under his hands, he must take revenge. But if he survives a day or two, will not be punished: for he is his money.

God forgives not only slavery, but is also completely at ease with the idea to beat the slaves, unless you kill them.

Exodus Chapter 21, verse 32:

If the ox gores a slave or a slave, he shall give unto their master thirty shekels of silver, and the ox shall be stoned.

God forgives not only slavery, but God assigns a value to the slaves - 30 shekels of silver. Note that God is not sophisticated enough to understand the concept of inflation. Now 3000 years have passed and a gored slave is still worth 30 shekels of silver, in the words of God

Leviticus Chapter 22, verse 10:

No stranger shall eat the holy things: either the ' guest of a priest or the employee may eat the holy things. But a person, the priest will be bought with money, they can mangiare: così anche quelli che gli sono nati in casa: questi potranno mangiare il suo pane.

Qui Dio dice che i figli degli schiavi sono schiavi loro stessi e che egli è completamente a suo agio con questo concetto.

Levitico Capitolo 25, verso 44:

Quanto allo schiavo e alla schiava, che avrai in proprietà, potrete prenderli dalle nazioni che vi circondano; da queste potrete comprare lo schiavo e la schiava. Potrete anche comprarne tra i figli degli stranieri, stabiliti presso di voi e tra le loro famiglie che sono presso di voi, tra i loro figli nati nel vostro paese; saranno vostra proprietà. Li potrete lasciare in eredità ai vostri figli dopo di voi, come loro proprietà; vi potrete servire sempre di loro come di schiavi; ma quanto ai vostri fratelli, gli Israeliti, ognuno nei riguardi dell'altro, non lo tratterai con asprezza.

Qui Dio dice dove potete comprare gli schiavi e specifica chiaramente che gli schiavi sono proprietà che possono essere comprate, vendute e cedute.

Luca Capitolo 7, verso 2

Il servo di un centurione era ammalato e stava per morire. Il centurione l'aveva molto caro. Perciò, avendo udito parlare di Gesù, gli mandò alcuni anziani dei Giudei a pregarlo di venire e di salvare il suo servo. They came to Jesus, besought him: "He deserves that grace you do this, they said, because he loves our people, and it was he who built us our synagogue." Jesus went with them. It was not now far from the house when the centurion sent friends to say, "Lord, do not trouble yourself, I am not worthy that you come under my roof, which is why I did not even presume to come to you, but say the word and my servant will be healed. I too am a man under authority, and I have soldiers under me and I say this one, Go, and he goes, and to another, Come, and he is, and to my servant, Do this, and he does it. " Jesus heard this he was amazed and followed him to the crowd that said, "I tell you, even in Israel have I found such faith." And the envoys when they came home, found the servant healed.

Here the Gospel of CEI, hypocritically, translates as "servant" what actually was the "slave" in the original text. It seems that the CEI will not have problems with the slaves when they are present in the Old Testament, but can not accept their presence in the novel, even if they are slaves of Roman centurions.

Here we see that Jesus was completely comfortable with the concept of slavery. Jesus heals the slave without neanche pensare a liberarlo o ad ammonirne il padrone.

Lettera di Paolo ai colossesi, Capitolo 3, verso 22:

Voi, servi, siate docili in tutto con i vostri padroni terreni; non servendo solo quando vi vedono, come si fa per piacere agli uomini, ma con cuore semplice e nel timore del Signore. Qualunque cosa facciate, fatela di cuore come per il Signore e non per gli uomini.

Anche qui la CEI, ipocritamente, traduce con "servo" ciò che effettivamente era "schiavo" nel testo originale, anche se poi il testo tradisce il significato originale.

Qui Dio mostra di essere d'accordo with the position of the slave, and encourages slaves to work hard. This sentiment is reiterated in the letter of Paul to Titus, chapter 2, verse 9:

urges the slaves to be obedient to their masters in everything, they content themselves and not to the contrary, not ruby, but show absolute loyalty, to honor all the doctrine of God our Savior.

Oops, this should have escaped the censor of the CEI ...

Once again God shows that he is fascinated by bondage.

God loves slaves

If the Bible was written by God and that is the word of the Lord, then you can come to one conclusion: God is a great champion of slavery and fully supports the concept.

As you can see, these slavery passages present us with an immense contradiction:

• On the one hand we all know that slavery is a violence and a moral abomination. As a result of slavery is now completely illegal throughout the developed world.
• Second, the majority of Christians claim that the Bible is the word of God from God, "Creator of the universe" declares that slavery is perfectly acceptable. Beating slaves is fine. According the Bible, we should practice slavery today.

The intensity of this contradiction is striking. It shows quite clearly that God is imaginary.

If God existed and if he was playing any role on our planet, would have eliminated this connection between self and slavery. There is no way that a loving God can allow himself to be perceived as one that supports and encourages slavery in this way.

This is what I'd let you know: you, as rational human beings, you know that slavery is wrong. You know . That is why every nation in the world civile ha reso la schiavitù completamente illegale. Gli esseri umani hanno reso la schiavitù illegale, in disobbedienza diretta alla parola di Dio, perché tutti noi sappiamo con assoluta certezza che la schiavitù è un abominio.

Cosa vi dice il senso comune adesso, di una Bibbia che approva la schiavitù nel Vecchio e nel Nuovo testamento? Dato il fatto che la Bibbia perdona chiaramente la schiavitù, il vostro senso comune dovrebbe dirvi che Dio non esiste.

Capire le razionalizzazioni

Molti credenti diranno che Dio doveva parlare in questo modo nel Vecchio Testamento, perché doveva "adeguarsi" alla cultura dominante. Questo, naturalmente, is stupid. In Christian mythology, God is the one who created human beings and human culture. In addition, a God who forgives those who beat the slaves and the development of children in slavery, at any time, is an abomination.

In addition, God has intervened many times in the uses and customs of humanity to ban things that were going to invent a genius or even of whole cloth whole complex rituals. Why now should not speak against slavery, after you change religion to those who worshiped the golden calf and imposed rites such as circumcision?

A believer can say, "Well, all those verses of the Old Testament and not longer apply after Jesus. "This line of rationalization leads to several obvious observations. Why the Old Testament is still printed in the Bible, if Jesus has made it obsolete? Why God never said he would beat the slaves?

The most important thing that this rationale did not remember, is that Jesus has clearly stated that the laws of the Old Testament remain in force. In Matthew 5:18:

Verily I say unto you until they are gone and the sky the land, it will not even an iota or a sign from the law, till all be fulfilled.

Then goes on to say:

Whosoever therefore shall break one of these precepts, however minimal, and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven. Who does them and teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I say unto you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

According to Jesus the Old Testament is still alive and being followed to the letter. According to Isaiah 40:8, "the word of our God stands forever." The notion that these verses of the Old Testament no longer apply is absolutely false according to the Bible. I imagine that the Christian Bible "no longer apply" to rationalize their religion. Other believers

rationalize that God did not write these passages on slavery in the Bible. The Bible was somehow corrupted by men who wanted slavery. In this case, the obvious question to do is this: If the Bible has been corrupted, how do we know which parts of the Bible come from God and which parts were inserted by primitive men? There is absolutely no way of knowing.

The prophecies of the Old Testament are absolutely necessary for the New makes sense. If it were not for the wait and all the messianic prophecies about its completion, the New Testament is merely the story of yet another prophet jew. Declare his "son of God" not merely a metaphorical formula (we would all "sons of God" after all?) The Old Testament is necessary and central to the Christian religion, regardless of where it can not at the cost of losing his religious status and become a mere philosophy.

is when you start thinking about the Bible in this way that we understand something very important about the Bible itself. Either the entire Bible is the word of God, or the entire Bible was written by primitive men without any prompting from God This is the reason for this linea di divisione così forte:

Se parte della Bibbia viene da Dio e parte da uomini primitivi, non si può conoscerne la differenza. Non si può sapere se Gesù è realmente risorto o se questa è semplicemente una credenza inserita da uomini primitivi. Come facciamo a sapere se sia stato Dio a scrivere i dieci comandamenti o no? Se una qualsiasi parte della Bibbia è stata inquinata da uomini primitivi, dobbiamo rifiutare il tutto. Non c'è modo di sapere chi ha scritto cosa, quindi l'intero libro non è più valido.

Non c'è veramente via di mezzo e la Bibbia deve essere presa come un blocco unico. O l'intera Bibbia è stata scritta da Dio o nessuna parte di essa lo è.

Now that we have enunciated this principle of a single block, we can say that there are two possible explanations to passages of the Bible on slavery:

• The Bible is right and God loves slavery. The entire Bible is the word of God, then even the slavery passages must be the word of God's laws all modern nations that make slavery illegal defy the word of God who spread the word of God and the Ten Commandments should also promote the concept of slavery.
• forgive slavery because the Bible was written by men who owned slaves, not from God, God does not exist.

Chances are you have some problem with the first explanation. God would not be the champion of abomination that is slavery. We all know that.

Therefore, what remains is the second explanation.

Mattia Fabbri Philosopher by http://www.godisimaginary.com/

Take My Dachsun On A Plane

Inspired by the Bible ... and by whom? Not only

MY THOUGHTS ON ORIGINAL SIN

(Mattia Fabbri Philosopher)

Darwinism can not remain indifferent to the Christian churches, since it puts the game completely out of their common foundation, namely the existence of Adam and Eve and the historicity of original sin ...... Without the original sin in fact - as Augustine saw good - there is no need for a redeemer, Christ's death loses its value offering, and therefore the Church loses its monopoly of the object (The saving grace to administer and bestow his flock through the other sacraments, instruments of social control). That is no small thing! Perhaps a Christian member of the heresy of Pelagius (who did not believe in the transmissibility of original sin) would have less trouble accepting Darwin. But where are the Pelagians nowadays? :-) Catholicism, the various Protestant and Orthodox churches can not do without the original sin (and therefore of Adam and Eve) as it constitutes the focus of theological doctrines and the basis of their self-identification. In other words: without the disease to be treated (original sin) are not physicians (the various Christian churches) as the medicine (Grace, which we believe custodian, and that it provides through Baptism) is no longer necessary. why not just allegorize the content of Genesis to reconcile Darwin with various institutional Christianity, rather it should NOT INSPIRED declare the Letter of Paul to the Romans, where it clearly states that "because of one man (Adam) is entrata nel mondo la morte": cosa che nessun cristianesimo attuale potrà mai fare, se non a costo di rinnegare sé stesso.

Mattia fabbri