MY THOUGHTS ON ORIGINAL SIN
(Mattia Fabbri Philosopher)
Darwinism can not remain indifferent to the Christian churches, since it puts the game completely out of their common foundation, namely the existence of Adam and Eve and the historicity of original sin ...... Without the original sin in fact - as Augustine saw good - there is no need for a redeemer, Christ's death loses its value offering, and therefore the Church loses its monopoly of the object (The saving grace to administer and bestow his flock through the other sacraments, instruments of social control). That is no small thing! Perhaps a Christian member of the heresy of Pelagius (who did not believe in the transmissibility of original sin) would have less trouble accepting Darwin. But where are the Pelagians nowadays? :-) Catholicism, the various Protestant and Orthodox churches can not do without the original sin (and therefore of Adam and Eve) as it constitutes the focus of theological doctrines and the basis of their self-identification. In other words: without the disease to be treated (original sin) are not physicians (the various Christian churches) as the medicine (Grace, which we believe custodian, and that it provides through Baptism) is no longer necessary. why not just allegorize the content of Genesis to reconcile Darwin with various institutional Christianity, rather it should NOT INSPIRED declare the Letter of Paul to the Romans, where it clearly states that "because of one man (Adam) is entrata nel mondo la morte": cosa che nessun cristianesimo attuale potrà mai fare, se non a costo di rinnegare sé stesso.
Mattia fabbri
0 comments:
Post a Comment