No imposed on the crucifix ... but the cross is a different reality ...
Beyond all the rants that are made these days about the symbol of the cross, rants that inevitably arise as a result of misuse of this symbol that has been done historically and, even more, beyond the reasons puerile that the church gives this symbol and that it even makes us see how, even though it has this symbol, in fact none has ever grasped the meaning than to flaunt as a symbol of redemption that brings up the crucifix as the one who with his sacrifice has freed the world from the evil (yes, the great theological flaw that generates obsessional neurosis), well beyond all these considerations, in my view insufficient to demolish this symbol, I would try to give a meaning of this sign which is the result of what the cross really is.
Meanwhile this is the oldest symbol of the crucifix itself, and of Christianity itself. And 'the symbol of the three dimensions of infinite space, if prolonged, in fact, the two lines cross, they have no end.
But the most important thing is that the cross is geometrically the intersection of two diameters of a sphere, in this case appropriately chosen to create a perfect perpendicularity. We take as a reference but in fact only two in the same sphere diameters are endless. Two signify, as already mentioned, the perfect perpendicularity that within an infinite sphere, cosmic symbolism, the endless lines may be present in it.
Ultimately if we think of the cross as the set of infinitives energy ties between the two cross into the cosmic sphere, which hold together the Cosmo stesso, allora il tutto assume un significato di Unità.
Immaginiamo una Sfera e al suo interno gli infiniti diametri esistenti.
Ebbene questi infiniti diametri presenti nella Sfera cosmica avranno tutti i propri corrispettivi che si incroceranno in modo perpendicolare, formando così una perfetta rete energetica che tiene unito il Cosmo in modo tale da farlo risultare perfettamente sferico.
E' dunque inutile denigrare la croce facendogli assumere ad esempio la forma di una svastica: In questo caso è l'uomo che ha aggiunto ad ogni estremo della croce, dei piccoli segmenti che ne snaturano la forma naturale.
Voglio solo affermare che se spiegassimo ad ogni uomo-donna, credente o meno, che the cross is what I just said, no one would dare call into question the validity of the cosmos. A Muslim because he hates the cross? Simple: because the cross was the symbol of those who were killed. The atheist because he hates the cross? Why not accept the right meant that the church gave her hanging a man who has come through the cross to redeem us (sign macabre).
The cross, therefore, WITHOUT THE CROSS, is in itself a sign of unity of the cosmos, the same way, should symbolize the unity of humankind, as many small Cosmi us all.
This meaning of the cross makes it no more a sign or a sign of moral injustice, although that would already be commendable.
The Cross is, in short, the distinctive symbol of the cosmic forces that drive evolution in the Universe. E ', therefore, a secular symbol for excellence and has nothing to do with religion. The church has made it a sign of exploitation, but not for this division must be a cosmic symbol of hate just because it has been used to kill. And 'as if I hated all the trees of the earth because somebody uses the branches of trees to beat people.
If so I have no trouble keeping this symbol in my house. Indeed the cross gaurdando I remember that I'm evolving with the universe. But if we all understood keep it outside the home, in all spheres of civil life, where she reminds the viewer that we are all evolving, so to speak, and then, crossing the each other. What better symbol to describe the mutual love?
Figliodeltuono
0 comments:
Post a Comment