The logical response to the dogma of everlasting Hell (II part)
taking up the theme of everlasting Hell sull'inesistenza we started to analyze in the last article and let us continue to ask unsettling questions that make us more and more sense that hell is a false history and too many even today, the "use" as a way to still have control over consciences. Enough of the delegate to others the responsibility for their own conscience. Each reason for themselves and realize, at least, that certain truths of faith can not stand the test of reason. But we continue with the questions: Assuming that Lucifer was created in an eternal hell, but the questions above convince us to the contrary, the infinite mercy of God can be reconciled with the existence of an eternal hell and a fallen angel that lives there and does everything possible to bring in more people? At the end of time when God will be all in all, as Paul assures us, God Himself will be all in hell and all except those who live there, first of all Lucifer? Can you imagine a mother and her son in heaven, perhaps criminal, to hell? How does the mother to enjoy the bliss of heaven with the thought that his son was in torment in hell and no way out? Moms, how would you feel? Still, God may allow man, throughout la sua vita, sia disturbato da un essere così cattivo al punto tale che, in determinati casi, possono manifestarsi fenomeni di possessione diabolica? Se Dio Trinità abita nel cuore di ogni Creatura, frutto, questo, dell’Incarnazione, evento fondante della fede cristiana, come può questo presunto diavolo prendere il posto di Dio nel cuore dell’uomo, dando così luogo ad una possessione demoniaca? Dio, può permettere questo? Non genera, tutto questo, una penosa consapevolezza nell’uomo? Quella, in pratica, di essere alla mercé di un essere personale malvagio, nonostante la sua fede in Dio? E tutto ciò non genera, forse, nel cuore dell’uomo, la paura che affidarsi a Dio non basti più? It may, God, let the man himself may think that God is not sufficient to ensure the happiness in this way, because of the unpredictability of the devil that would implement any strategy to fill the human heart? And God would be taken by surprise by this Lucifer, then you need to drive it out of the exorcist? Or should we believe that God first allows the devil to possess a man and then drive it out of the exorcist? But that is what God play dice with human beings? It is said often that the devil tempts and torments the most good, most holy (it is known in the literature of the lives of saints, the fierce struggle between the saint and the devil). So do not conviene essere buoni? O aspirare alla Santità? O non sarà forse vero che certe manifestazioni di lotte contro il diavolo non sono altro che fenomeni isterici o genericamente psicosomatici che il cervello umano, ancora ai primordi per quanto riguarda la manifestazione dei suoi eccezionali poteri, può manifestare all’esterno? Non ci assicura forse, la scienza, che il cervello umano, che è in Evoluzione, lavora solo ad una bassissima percentuale rispetto alle potenzialità infinite che possiede in se? Questo è il motivo per cui il cervello umano manifesta anche poteri incontrollabili e incontrollati, che spesso vengono fuori senza che ne conosciamo i meccanismi. Nel cervello c’è tutta la scienza divina “in potenza”, in other words all the potential good God, that the same human being can act out so good if you like, so bad if he is led to believe that there is a foul to be bothering him. None of us knows the power of autosuggestion, which is a powerful force that can even heal us from disease, but at the same time, if stimulated to believe in evil spirits that can take possession of a person, leads one to believe in themselves and feel evils that have an array that are mistaken for mental and possessions? The brain may also manifest absurdities as the appearance of demonic possession if someone is convinced that he possessed, as well as the exaltation mystical if someone is convinced of being the beloved of God are proof of the phenomena of mass hysteria for the visions and the phenomena of mass auto-suggestion when you attend the so-called harvest of healing. There are, therefore, also the phenomena of negative auto-suggestion, when the man is believed to be owned, just because someone with no scruples, has taught for centuries that the devil can take possession of him. And 'science should reveal that, from time to time, what happens in our brain in evolution and not the exorcist. But back to the provocative questions and at the same logic: It is often said, with regard to the devil, that God tests his. Using the devil? Then the devil is subject to the will of God? If so, why did God, then, precipitates the hell? If the devil is an instrument of God, because God will damn for ever? At this point the devil might say to God: "I have helped to grow the man through temptation and suffering that come from me. Now the man grew up as you wanted, then I will have been helpful, now it drives me to hell for all eternity? No! So do not go out. Already a matter of logic (the logic is a gift from God) we can not answer these questions without undermine the image of God, which will bear the semblance of a tyrant. D 'other hand, if we save the idea of \u200b\u200ba good God-merciful-infinite love, it automatically collapses the figure of the devil. E 'have to answer to these questions? I think not! The same questions contain the answer! The questions asked have a duty to awaken in us the critical conscience positive, asleep by now a pressing preaching and a negative mental bombardment that led, in the hearts of Christians of all time, the fear of God, the terror of the devil the fear of life itself, so all cling to the figure of the Mother of God as one who alone can save us from this state of affairs. But I refer you to the next article, where we will continue our analysis in the third and last part.
Figliodeltuono
0 comments:
Post a Comment